This article, from National Public Radio is accompanied by the audio of the story. You can hear it by clicking on the URL.
The issue is that the rail authority persists in doing what is has been doing from the very beginning, promoting itself with rationalizations that make very little sense. Fortunately, more and more people are beginning to see through this sales job and understand that there are future adverse consequences, even if there is a large funding expenditure from the state and federal government into their town or district.
HSR money has many strings attached to it. If that isn't recognized now, there will be a great deal of grief, and kicking oneself in the behind in the future.
Jeff Barker, the head spokesperson for the CHSRA is permanently on the defensive, and for good reason. This time, in his grasp for the appropriate metaphor, he says: "I think there are very few people who save their pennies in a bank and wait until they have the entire $250,000 sitting in their hand before they get the keys to their home"
This is wrong on several counts. First of all, his concept of house purchasing is exactly what caused the bursting of the housing bubble and the consequent economic downturn from which we are yet to recover, if ever. Is Barker saying that they are building this train with a sub-prime mortgage? Now that I think about it, it's a better analogy than I first assumed.
This is a single mega-infrastructure project the financial structure of which is a one event bubble. Since there is no funding for it on the horizon, and in this economy there won't be, this HSR bubble is doomed to also burst, like our economy, and with similar consequences. As they say, do the math!
Furthermore, Barker is justifying the fact that they are starting in the Central Valley (not by choice, by the way, but by requirement from the FRA) and don't have any idea about where the rest of the funding is coming from. He wants us to believe that that's OK.
Barker's analogy is false. It's not like buying a house with only a down-payment. In this case, 1.) we don't know the eventual cost of the house, 2.) there is a huge likelihood that it will be far more expensive than currently projected, and 3.) we don't have any idea whatsoever where the subsequent payments are going to come from, because we're unemployed. Let's say that another way, staying with Barker's metaphor. Under similar financial circumstances as the CHSRA finds itself, there is no way that anyone would sell them a house.
Mayor Henshaw, of Corcoran, asks the right question, although he is as eager for "free" funding for his town and it's huge unemployment problem as anyone in the Central Valley. He says, "Why start something if you're not going to finish it?" And the jobs that it would create for Corcoran are fantastic — that's great — we love it, we need it, we want to see the economy of Corcoran begin to thrive. But sometimes you wonder, at what cost?"
At what cost, indeed! What is suggested here is that the fact of it being a high-speed, or any other speed, train is far less significant than the fact of it bringing funding into a cash-starved region. That means, whenever people will tell you how much they want this project to come to their town or locale, is it the train they want or is it the money?
There is support for an improved rail service if it connects the unemployed residents of the Central Valley with the job opportunities in the major population regions. But, that would make it a regional commuter rail system, which is nothing like what is presently planned. In short, they are building the wrong thing, in the wrong place, for too much money, where it won't do any good. And, they can't pay for it anyhow.
Many of those in California's residential areas quickly came to understand the adverse impact the train would impose on their region. The Central Valley is now also waking up to the facts of how much the train will damage the agricultural productivity of the Valley and that the promised jobs will be fewer and more temporary than promised.
It's not too late to just say no.
=================================
A Call To Slow Down California's High-Speed Rail
by SHEREEN MERAJI
February 24, 2011
Florida, Ohio and Wisconsin have turned down billions of federal dollars for high-speed rail. But California is moving forward with its high-speed rail project and welcomes the federal money the other states left behind.
The first leg of California's train is set to run between Fresno and Bakersfield — two cities in the state's breadbasket region.
Critics of the plan say it doesn't make sense to put a passenger train in the middle of farmland during a fiscal crisis. But the California High-Speed Rail Authority says the Central Valley is a smart place to begin laying down track.
The agency says there's plenty of space, it will bolster the sagging economy, and the train will have to run through that part of California to connect the San Francisco Bay Area to Los Angeles.
A Train Through Farm Country
Corcoran, Calif., a small farming community, is smack in the middle of the first leg. City Manager Ron Hoggard compares his town to the Andy Griffith Show's Mayberry. That analogy would be dead-on if nearly half of Mayberry's population was behind bars. Twelve of the 25,000 Corcoran residents are wards of the state. Corcoran is home to two prisons and a lot of farmland, and the city has an unemployment rate of 17 percent.
With lots of open space and a bad economy, Corcoran represents the path of least resistance for California's controversial high-speed rail project. But Hoggard and Mayor Larry Hanshew are still not convinced that high-speed rail is a good idea.
"Why start something if you're not going to finish it?" Hanshew says. "And the jobs that it would create for Corcoran are fantastic — that's great — we love it, we need it, we want to see the economy of Corcoran begin to thrive. But sometimes you wonder, at what cost?"
Hanshew runs through his list of unanswered questions: Will the jobs created be permanent? Where will the tracks go? How noisy will it be? And is there enough money to finish the project?
Is There Ample Funding?
On top of those worries, he's fielding concerns from locals who are convinced that a bullet train will kill their livelihoods.
Barrie Boyett, who has been farming in Corcoran for the past 50 years, says he doesn't know exactly where the train will go, but he's pretty sure it's going to run right through his ranchland.
"It'll ruin our ranch, I mean absolutely ruin it," he says, smacking his leg for emphasis. "And I know how the government works: They'll buy the land at the cheapest price they can get it for."
What Boyett doesn't know or understand is why California is moving ahead with high-speed rail without the $45 billion needed to finish it.
"I don't plant a crop until I know I've got the money to finish that crop," the exasperated farmer says.
California's Down Payment
Jeff Barker, the deputy director of the California High-Speed Rail Authority, says a better analogy is comparing the project to the purchase of a house.
"I think there are very few people who save their pennies in a bank and wait until they have the entire $250,000 sitting in their hand before they get the keys to their home," he says.
Barker says the process begins with a good down payment. California, he says, already has one — $3.6 billion in federal money and nearly $10 billion from California taxpayers.
He says now is the time to act — before California's population grows by one-third in the next two decades. It's projected to increase to 50 million people, up from 38 million today.
"We can wait until everything is gridlocked, or we can do what governments are supposed to do, which is look to the future, plan for future growth [and] invest in our infrastructure now," Barker says.
A State Senator's Call For Reassessing The Plan
State Sen. Alan Lowenthal, a Democrat from Long Beach, agrees that high-speed rail is an investment in California's future. But he wants everyone to take a step back and reassess the current plan.
Lowenthal just introduced a bill that would, if passed, replace the current board of California's High-Speed Rail Authority with experts vetted by the state government. He doesn't trust the authority's ridership numbers, its estimated cost for the project or its decision to put the first leg in farm country.
"I just really would like us to take a deep breath, not to make decisions because there's a gun to our head. Because unless we make this decision, we're going to lose this federal money, because still, the largest contributors are the people of California, and we need accurate data," he says.
Barker welcomes legislative help that will move the project forward. But he thinks taking too much time will mean the end of the line for high-speed rail in California.
